DarkFalcon
06-19-2006, 11:53 PM
Aperture
There are a few set sizes for the aperture, those are the following:
1, 1.4, 1.8, 2, 2.8, 4, 5.6, 8, 11, 16, 22, 32 etc. They are commonly referred to as f-numbers, and are then written like f/5.6 for example. Not all cameras/lenses can use as low numbers as 1.4, many start first at 2.8-4.
1/aperture opening size + 1/shutter opening duration = 1/ISO
f/stop no. + shutter speed = ISO
when the aperture opening size area is decreased by n times (linearly 1, 2, 3, 4, 5....), the diameter is also decreased by a per-calculated protocol in which the denominator is the no. of times the diameter is decreased (if i didn't remember wrongly it goes f/1, f/1.4, f/2, f/2.8, f/4, f/5.6 ....). so while the aperture opening decreases (less light in), the f/stop number increases (less light in). note the reverse relationship.
Here a picture of opening lens f-stop
http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d164/clavinpan28/fstop.jpg
There are a few set sizes for the aperture, those are the following:
1, 1.4, 1.8, 2, 2.8, 4, 5.6, 8, 11, 16, 22, 32 etc. They are commonly referred to as f-numbers, and are then written like f/5.6 for example. Not all cameras/lenses can use as low numbers as 1.4, many start first at 2.8-4.
1/aperture opening size + 1/shutter opening duration = 1/ISO
f/stop no. + shutter speed = ISO
when the aperture opening size area is decreased by n times (linearly 1, 2, 3, 4, 5....), the diameter is also decreased by a per-calculated protocol in which the denominator is the no. of times the diameter is decreased (if i didn't remember wrongly it goes f/1, f/1.4, f/2, f/2.8, f/4, f/5.6 ....). so while the aperture opening decreases (less light in), the f/stop number increases (less light in). note the reverse relationship.
Here a picture of opening lens f-stop
http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d164/clavinpan28/fstop.jpg